Fonts for Contemporary Use
December 29, 2008
In a blog post that I wrote for work today, I had occasion to use an interrobang as part of a title. Hooray! A chance to exercise some pointless effort in pursuit of typographical correctness.
But chasing down that obscure character led me to thinking about an opportunity that still exists for all the type designers out there. Does any commercially-available font out there do a good job of anticipating modern uses of text like smileys and texting shortcuts, and create styled characters or ligatures for them?
We will increasingly see marks like :) and "B4" and "OMG" showing up in print or in styled text online, and that means we should have appropriate typography to represent these words and phrases as our language evolves. This, of course, would also require a Unicode character representation to be added for common smilies, just as one was added for the Euro symbol when that currency was introduced.
The Euro mark also offers us an opportunity to avoid a mistake made when that symbol was introduced. The familiar � mark was unfortunately introduced more as a logo than as a character, meaning designers were initially discouraged from tailoring the presentation of the symbol for appopriate display in the context of a particular font.
With smileys, and especially with new text ligatures from characters that would never have been paired up in the past, we have the chance to see font designers interpret these new parts of the language in the context of type designs that may have existed in some form for centuries. That promises to be fascinating!
Of course, I'm far from an expert about type, let alone about design in general, so maybe someone's already doing good work in this realm, and it's just escaped my notice. Either way, I look forward to finding out when I'll be able to use typographically elegant OMGs and ;)s on my blog.
5 Comments
Leave a comment
- Earlier: Spreadsheet Art Revisited
- Next: How To Get Windows

Holy crap, what you said.
Typing out a smiley was fun fifteen years ago. Would they get it?
Now it feels... juvenile.
The typographers are way ahead of you, according to this BoingBoing post from 2005:
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/11/23/typographers-ponder-.html
&omfglig;
Yeah, I remember that link well, as I had talked about it with Rebecca before she'd sent it to BoingBoing. But that was theoretical � now I'm looking for the idea actually being put into practice. And for fontographers to actually allocate character codes to these symbols. That's the harder part, I think, and the one that still hasn't seen any progress.
I have no doubt that, given those prerequisites, finding plenty of creative designs will be no problem at all.
You only need a code point if it is designated a new character. There are existing smileys in unicode: 263A ?, 263B ? and unsmiley 2639 ? Not to mention the japanese postal mark face 3020 ?
Ligatures, on the other hand, can be added to a font without a new unicode code point - if you're on a Mac, try typing some text in Zapfino to see how elegant this can be. If you care about type and you aren't on a Mac, wtf?