<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2007/01/whats-the-word.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,2007:/anil//1.6648-</id>
  <updated>2009-08-10T20:19:28Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for What&apos;s the Word?</title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2007:/anil//1.6648</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2007/01/whats-the-word.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6648" title="What's the Word?" />
    <published>2007-01-15T19:59:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-01-15T20:00:13Z</updated>
    <title>What&apos;s the Word?</title>
    <summary>I found Frank Hilario&apos;s rant entitled Microsoftâ€™s Mr Bill Gates And The Boy Who Cried Worp to be largely incoherent, but from what I could...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="tech" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I found Frank Hilario's rant entitled  <a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=19073">Microsoftâ€™s Mr Bill Gates And The Boy Who Cried Worp</a> to be largely incoherent, but from what I could deduce, he thinks my <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2006/06/19/office_2007_is_">assessment of Microsoft Office 2007</a> is off-base. Actually, he says:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>If you canâ€™t beat them, donâ€™t join them; instead, change the rules of the game. Thatâ€™s what Worperer Microsoft did with Word 2007, Paul Thurrott (2006, cited) says. Yes. Anil Dash (2006, cited) says: â€˜By radically changing the user interface in Office 2007, Microsoft made the riskiest bet in the history of commercial software. And I think theyâ€™re going to win the bet.â€™ Wanna bet?</p>

<p>So, hereâ€™s another idea, also from me: Go get a fresh tablet of stone and etch on it the idea of an entirely new word processor. Worperers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your worps!</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Once you've lost your worps, you may enjoy <a href="http://rc3.org/2007/01/defining_your_m.php">Rafe's musings</a> on music collections, inspired in part by my <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2007/01/10/my_library_is_d">loss of my iTunes library</a>. There are also a lot of really great comments on that thread, thanks to everyone who's contributed.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2007:/anil//1.6648-comment:134739</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.dashes.com,2007:/anil//1.6648" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2007/01/whats-the-word.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2007/01/whats-the-word.html#c134739" />
    <title>Comment from Frank A Hilario on 2007-02-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Frank A Hilario</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you want my reply, visit my blogsite.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-02-08T20:39:54Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
