<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2006/12/steal-this-ui.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,2006:/anil//1.6612-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for <![CDATA[Microsoft Says, &quot;Steal This UI&quot;]]></title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.31-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2006:/anil//1.6612</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2006/12/steal-this-ui.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6612" title="Microsoft Says, &quot;Steal This UI&quot;" />
    <published>2006-12-20T15:00:23Z</published>
    <updated>2006-12-20T15:33:16Z</updated>
    <title>Microsoft Says, &quot;Steal This UI&quot;</title>
    <summary>Summary: Earlier this year, I said that Office 2007 is the bravest upgrade ever, and the reason was simple: The audacity of introducing a radical...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="tech" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Summary: Earlier this year, I said that <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2006/06/19/office_2007_is_">Office 2007</a> is the bravest upgrade ever, and the reason was simple: The audacity of introducing a radical new user interface was as surprising as the vast improvements it yielded in productivity. Now, Microsoft has decided to <a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/office/aa973809.aspx">license that user interface to other developers</a>, being surprisingly open in the license terms and potentially improving the user experience for dozens of other applications.</p>

<p><img alt="Word 2007 has the wacky ribbon" src="http://www.dashes.com/anil/word2007.png" width="346" height="278" class="imgcenter" /></p>

<p>When I <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2006/06/19/office_2007_is_">wrote about Office 2007</a> back in June, the benefits were obvious to me:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>They killed the File menu, along with all the other menus. They added a giant, weird circular target up in the corner. They actually use part of the title bar as a menu sometimes. They even changed the default font in all the apps. What's amazing is not just that it works, but that it works so well.</p>

<p>My experience has been the same as most of those who I know that are using the new version: Word went from being frustrating and confusing to fairly straightforward to use. PowerPoint went, in a single upgrade, from being the worst widely-available presentation software to being the best. Excel is a fundamentally different kind of spreadsheet application, focused on presenting information usefully instead of optimizing for the creation of complex formulas.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Anne Chen and Michael Caton wrote an <a href="http://www.serveriq.net/print_article2/0,1217,a=196017,00.asp">excellent overview of Office 2007</a> in eWeek, and I don't know if they or their editor created the headline, but it gets to the gist of the story pretty effectively: <strong>"Office 2007 Will Rock Corporations' Worlds"</strong>.</p>

<p>Though the <a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/office/aa973809.aspx">Office UI Licensing page</a> is a little short on details, as always, Jensen Harris articulates the story perfectly <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/jensenh/archive/2006/11/21/licensing-the-2007-microsoft-office-user-interface.aspx">on his blog</a>:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>[M]ore than a year ago we started talking about how we could share the design work we've done more broadly in a way that also protects the value of Microsoft's investment in this research and development.</p>

<p>Well, I'm pleased to finally be able to definitively answer the question. Today, we're announcing a licensing program for the 2007 Microsoft Office system user interface which allows virtually anyone to obtain a royalty-free license to use the new Office UI in a software product, including the Ribbon, galleries, the Mini Toolbar, and the rest of the user interface. </p>

</blockquote>

<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000HCVR30/2020-20" style="float : right; text-decoration : none; padding-left : 10px;"><img src="http://www.dashes.com/anil/images/office-2007.jpg" width="221" height="280" alt="Office 2007" /></a>(Side note to Microsoft's communications team: I understand you feel you need to put out the standard <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2006/nov06/11-21officeui.mspx">boring press release</a>, but why not at least <em>link</em> to Jensen's blog from there, so that people reading about this won't think it's quite so boring?)</p>

<p>The best part is that the guidelines themselves are written in clear English. You can <a href="http://officeblogs.net/UI/Preview%202007%20Microsoft%20Office%20System%20UI%20Design%20Guidelines.pdf">download a sample</a> (1.4mb <span class="caps">PDF</span>) of the 120-page guidelines document. The example guidelines are about an esoteric area, resizing the items on the Ribbon toolbars, but are clear, comprehensible, and promise a lot of potential for the other pages in the document.</p>

<p>This is a fantastic trend, mirroring on the desktop what companies like Yahoo have done with licensing their <a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/">UI libraries</a> for the web. I'm cautiously optimistic that other developers might even follow the guidelines correctly, promising some productivity gains from the new generation of desktop apps.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>