<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2006/08/revisiting-the.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,2006:/anil//1.6499-</id>
  <updated>2009-08-10T20:21:19Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Revisiting the Wikipedia Conversation</title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2006:/anil//1.6499</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2006/08/revisiting-the.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6499" title="Revisiting the Wikipedia Conversation" />
    <published>2006-08-08T22:30:32Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-08T22:32:03Z</updated>
    <title>Revisiting the Wikipedia Conversation</title>
    <summary>There&apos;s been an interesting wave of news since my anti-Wikipedia roundup recently, most notably Jimmy Wales&apos; comments about the evolution of the community. This is...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>There's been an interesting wave of news since my <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2006/07/31/antipedia">anti-Wikipedia</a> <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2006/07/31/antiwikipedia_l">roundup</a> recently, most notably Jimmy Wales' <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/08/07/HNwikifuture_1.html">comments about the evolution of the community</a>. This is an <span class="caps">IDG </span>article on his statements, but it seems to be sourced from the AP story that appeared everywhere, including <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,71535-0.html">Wired</a>, pegged to the beginning of the Wikimania conference.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2006:/anil//1.6499-comment:45383</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.dashes.com,2006:/anil//1.6499" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2006/08/revisiting-the.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2006/08/revisiting-the.html#c45383" />
    <title>Comment from pwb on 2006-08-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>pwb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>There's a relatively easy fix for Wikipedia that would improve quality and accuracy while reducing controversy: limit article length.</p>

<p>Wikipedia is not expected to be the definitive, comprehensive source of information. As articles become longer, controversy, mistakes and deterioration are introduced.</p>

<p>Limiting article length would in no way compromise the ideals of Wikipedia.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-08-09T13:00:28Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>