<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2005/08/ignoring-the-hype.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,2005:/anil//1.2188-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Ignoring the Hype</title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2005:/anil//1.2188</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2005/08/ignoring-the-hype.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2188" title="Ignoring the Hype" />
    <published>2005-08-08T17:31:06Z</published>
    <updated>2005-08-12T06:50:00Z</updated>
    <title>Ignoring the Hype</title>
    <summary>Paul Scrivens has been doing a great job of leveraging his brash personality and formidable talent to make a name for himself, especially in the...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="tech" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Paul Scrivens has been doing a great job of leveraging his brash personality and formidable talent to make a name for himself, especially in the design world. And he did a hell of a job at the <a href="http://www.dashes.com/kick/">kickball game</a> this year, too. So I'm glad to see Scrivs focusing his energies on an idea like his new <a href="http://9rules.com/whitespace/ignoring_the_hype_series.php">Ignoring the Hype Series</a>.</p>

<p>In it, Paul's looking at sites that he feels are overhyped, and pointing out ways that we can all improve. Now, I've tried to push back against unwarranted hype myself, but I think the bigger point that Paul makes is that we do need good, well-reasoned criticism of the tools and technologies that are being delivered today. What I see right now is either breathless praise or "This sucks!" and very little detailed look at how the applications and services we use could be evolving. I'm hoping this starts a trend in that direction.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>