<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2005/05/maddening-detai.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,2005:/anil//1.2153-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Maddening Details</title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2005:/anil//1.2153</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2005/05/maddening-detai.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2153" title="Maddening Details" />
    <published>2005-05-31T21:23:50Z</published>
    <updated>2005-08-12T06:49:59Z</updated>
    <title>Maddening Details</title>
    <summary>Brent Simmons has been on an incredible roll recently on his weblog, covering little inconsistencies and frustrations in the Mac OS X interface that have...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="tech" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Brent Simmons has been on an incredible roll recently on <a href="http://inessential.com/">his weblog</a>, covering little inconsistencies and frustrations in the Mac OS X interface that have confronted him as he has been working to build his applications.</p>

<p>The point, to me, isn't that Apple sucks, or that any vendor sucks &mdash; they all do this. The point is that a lot of what goes into make a good experience with a software application is knowing that, even within a company that's known for being militant about its user experience, there might be half a dozen different ways to do the same thing. And that some percentage of your users will expect you to conform to the expectations set by each of those implementations.</p>

<p>I've seen this a lot in the work we do at Six Apart, because people use our tools on a variety of different operating systems and platforms. Some people never even see our applications, if they send in posts via email or from a posting client. And some administrators want to have a consistent experience, whether they're installing an app on a Windows laptop or on a Linux server.</p>

<p>What's amazing isn't that people have such a wide variety of expectations. The amazing part is that sane people can see <a href="http://inessential.com/2005/05/28.php">three different ways</a> to do the same thing, and want to still keep making applications. It just goes to show how addictive software can be.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>