Google Leverages Its Trust
December 15, 2004
David says that Google's angle on snapping up library content is to prevent banner farmers from scanning it all in and wrapping AdSense around it.
That may be, but I can't help but think this is also a defensive move, based on leveraging one of the assets they have against Microsoft in the search war: Trust. Google still has a good enough reputation that some of the finest institutions in the world will trust their knowledge and assets to a publicly held company. That's astonishing, especially given the anti-corporate slant that a lot of universities have.
Google's canny to take advantage of that now, but I'm wondering if they'd be able to do the same thing a year from now. Interestingly, Microsoft's never been able to really have the trust of universities, because they went from being in a tech industry that was then still not respected to being a huge economic and cultural force that schools didn't trust. This, despite the fact that Microsoft still spends a lot more on research and shares more of its work with schools than Google does.
3 TrackBacks
John Udell writes about Google and Libraries. Interesting developments. More on this from Anil Dash. Read More
The conventional wisdom here is simple: Google is trustworthy, Microsoft is not. These assumptions have thus far displayed a remarkable inertia and resistance to change. Google's "creepy" Gmail has thus far scared off few besides dedicated privacy zeal... Read More
Mark Rosensweig and I are on ALA Council together. Once in a while our planets align on an issue. I won't say that I agree with Mark word for word on Google Print, but he has articulated some concerns percolating... Read More
4 Comments
Leave a comment
- Earlier: What sort of city shall we be?
- Next: Cold Hard Fax

Excuse me? "... the anti-corporate slant that a lof of universities have ..." I've never set foot on the Harvard Campus thank G-d, but at Stanford (one of the other participating schools) you can't sneeze without seeing 8 different corporate names or logos
. In fact, many people are of the mind that Hennessey was taken on as Pres entirely because of his corporate connections.
Can the 'acceptance' side of this be devolved to a branding argument?
Google is your friend.
Microsoft is greedy.
(Yes I know that's not how MS brand themselves, I'm talking about perception of brand).
Is it that simple?
I wonder how this would be if Apple were in MS's position (presuming they could retain their current brand image).
Just a thought.
Can the 'acceptance' side of this be devolved to a branding argument?
Google is your friend.
Microsoft is greedy.
Every day, a new star is born. I turned my head, blushed, fluttered my hand up to my collarbone prettily, and gulped the last of my champagne. I know when I’ve been beaten.