<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2001/03/the-world-needs.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,2001:/anil//1.726-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for The World Needs Rock Stars</title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,2001:/anil//1.726</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/2001/03/the-world-needs.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=726" title="The World Needs Rock Stars" />
    <published>2001-03-21T07:19:09Z</published>
    <updated>2005-08-12T06:49:32Z</updated>
    <title>The World Needs Rock Stars</title>
    <summary>Why is it that today, especially in music, we have to choose between entertainment, meaning performance, and sincerity, meaning emotion? It frustrates me to no...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Why is it that today, especially in music, we have to choose between entertainment, meaning <em>performance</em>, and sincerity, meaning <em>emotion</em>? It frustrates me to no end that nobody's doing both anymore. I tend to have fleeting fondnesses for contemporary music, but nothing lasting, because it doesn't lend itself to being both appreciated <em>and</em> enjoyed.</p><p>I guess the two extremes in popular music are the Radiohead/Britney Spears continuum. And I love both their musical styles, which really aren't all that far apart. (Yes, yes, spare me the examples, there's tons of other stuff out there that I listen to and love that's much more underground, chock full of indie cred.) But I think it's more likely that Britney will grow into making introspective, challenging music than that Radiohead will ever strive to put on a spectacle for my amusement.</p><p>And that's a shame. Because it would make for a better end result. It would be Rock And Fucking Roll. I've never, ever, been one to say &quot;music was better back when...&quot; but I'm slowly becoming one of Those Guys. Not because there isn't great music out there; There inarguably is. But no one wants to write it, record it, and most of all <em>play it</em> for me.</p><p>The Stones didn't apologize about making great music. And they didn't apologize about Mick strutting around with his tongue out to sell it. I dig that. Is there anybody doing both these days? <a href="mailto:anil@dashes.com">Remind me</a>. And don't bother with your cousin's really, really great stuff up on MP3.com. I'm sure it <em>is</em> genuinely good. But I want a <strong>Rock Star</strong>.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
