<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/1999/09/passport-review.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,1999:/anil//1.55-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Passport Review</title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,1999:/anil//1.55</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/1999/09/passport-review.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=55" title="Passport Review" />
    <published>1999-09-21T16:00:01Z</published>
    <updated>2005-08-12T06:49:23Z</updated>
    <title>Passport Review</title>
    <summary>As promised: Microsoft Passport Part One: User Experience Okay, so after spending waaaay too much time reading all the documentation at the official Passport site,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="tech" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>As promised:</p>
<img src="images/mspass.gif" width="108" height="34" alt="Microsoft Passport">
<h3>Microsoft Passport Part One: User Experience</h3>
<p>Okay, so after spending waaaay too much time reading all the documentation at the official Passport site, I've been able to glean a little info on how the end-user will approach this technology.</p>
<p>This analysis is necessarily focused on the <strong>Wallet</strong> component of Passport, because this component (1) <strong>doesn't require NT</strong> Server's IIS, which I don't use, (2) can be <strong>referenced from any site</strong> through standard protocols, making its adoption much more likely to be pervasive, and (3) is <strong>closer to a release</strong> product. Enough intro, though, let's see what we've got...</p>
<p>First, let's address the <strong>goals</strong>, as I understand them:</p>

<p><strong>Reduce duplicate data entry of personal information:</strong> Great one, very needed, and relatively well addressed. The only clear win with Passport.</p>
<p><strong>Increase security of info:</strong> Another essential. Remains to be seen how well this one is handled, but Microsoft has a checkered history in this area, especially after the recent Hotmail CGI vulnerability.</p>
<p><strong>Introduces consistent e-commerce interface:</strong> Mixed bag. Consistency <em>between</em> multiple commerce sites <strong>reduces</strong> consistency <em>within</em> an individual site, assuming sites have significantly different designs, as most do. (see below)</p>
<p>An unstated, but likely, goal: <strong>Increasing the number of sites using secure technologies for transactions and registration:</strong> Will very likely succeed in this area, but adoption rates are notoriously hard to predict on the web.</p>
<p><strong>Increase user comfort:</strong> Remains to be seen. Seeing Microsoft's name should comfort most users, except possibly Linux users. The strength/weakness of the system is that all Password sites reinforce each others' images of security or vulnerability.</p>

<h3><img src="images/passport.gif" width="18" height="16" alt="Passport">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Whipping Out Your Passport</h3>

<p>Let's go deeper into this. The fundamental thing to know about Passport is that it's a <strong>typical Microsoft web initiative</strong>, equal parts evangelism, assimilation, marketing, and technology. That being said, it also displays Microsoft's usual knack for <em>eventually</em> resulting in end-user benefits by <strong>shamelessly pandering to developers</strong>.</p>

<p>Users (and in this context, I mean end-users on their web browsers at home on a dial-up) browse to your site. You've got your <strong>special features</strong>: a &quot;Members Only&quot; section with proprietary content, a little Shopping Cart e-boutique selling your logo gear, and your usual bevy of doodads, the site search, your homepage, the ugly slow page your client made you lard on despite your objections.</p>
<p>User X is new to your site, but desperately wants to see that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a>-style &quot;Registration Required&quot; material. So they click on the standard <strong>Passport Sign In Icon</strong> on your page.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="images/passsignin.gif" width="67" height="19" alt="Passport Sign In"> </p>
<p>Your server talks to Microsoft's, and they work out all the details. (More on the tech stuff tomorrow) <strong>We're in luck!</strong> User X has a Hotmail account already, so they're spared the ritual of registering for Passport. (Which isn't very trying, anyway.)</p>
<p>X sees the &quot;standard&quot; Passport sign in screen, and this is <strong>where the trouble starts</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Coming up:</strong> an in-depth look at <a href="http://www.passport.com" title="e-Wallet and Authentication Technology">Microsoft Passport</a>. Until I get all of that uploaded, take a look around their website and give me some <a href="mailto:anil@dashes.com">feedback</a> of your own.</p>
<p>Specifically, part one today will deal with <strong>user experience</strong> and part two tomorrow will describe the (rather ungainly) <strong>back-end technology</strong> that makes it work from the site manager's perspective.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Much of the information on the Passport site requires that you already <em>have</em> a passport, which you do if you have a <a href="http://www.hotmail.com">Hotmail</a> account.</p>
<p>While the <a href="http://www.passport.com/directory.asp">list of sites using Passport</a> right now is very short and limited to <a href="http://www.msn.com">MSN</a> sites, I'm expecting we'll see more of this technology (and, presumably, the inevitable open-source alternative) all over the web soon. Stay tuned...</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>