<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/1999/08/office-iconogra.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/anil/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:dashes.com,2009:/anil//1/tag:www.dashes.com,1999:/anil//1.37-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Office iconography</title>
  <subtitle>A Blog About Making Culture</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.3-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.dashes.com,1999:/anil//1.37</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://dashes.com/anil/1999/08/office-iconogra.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://dashes.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=37" title="Office iconography" />
    <published>1999-08-30T16:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2005-08-12T06:49:23Z</updated>
    <title>Office iconography</title>
    <summary>Little bit of appreciation for good design-- despite an underwhelming set of new features, Microsoft&apos;s Office 2000 has got some damn cool icons. They&apos;re almost...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Anil</name>
      <uri>http://anildash.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dashes.com/anil/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Little bit of appreciation for <strong>good design</strong>-- despite an underwhelming set of new features, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a>'s <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/office" title="Office Homepage">Office 2000</a> has got some damn cool icons.</p>
<p>They're almost childlike in their simplicity, they're extremely distinct from one another, even at very low resolutions, and they only use a few colors. Obviously, the whole design is very <strong>web-savvy</strong>. Interesting that one of the industry pundits said (derisively) that they looked as if they had been drawn with a crayon... I took that <strong>as a compliment</strong> to the designers.</p>
<p>Here's a sampling:</p>
<div align="center"><center><img src="/anil/images/officeicons.gif" alt="Office 2000 Icons" width="131" height="161"><img src="/anil/images/bigicons.gif" alt="Large Office 2000 Icons" width="222" height="146"></center></div>
<p>My <strong>favorite</strong> of all of these is <strong>Outlook</strong>. Besides being a kind of neat program with a horrible interface, the small icon for the program evokes not just the &quot;clock&quot; element of the product's time-management features, but also consists of an <strong>O</strong> and an <strong>L</strong>. OL = <strong>O</strong>ut<strong>l</strong>ook. Cool!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>
